I’m curious if you are suspicious of the congress people involved in disclosure. Not to be political, but it’s notable that Burchett, Luna, and Burlison all belong to the further right of the MAGA spectrum. I’d feel better if there was bipartisan support. The individuals all have kooky beliefs in other domains. This DOESNT discredit disclosure, but makes me worry they are vulnerable to false info 2a. Burchett is a moon landing denier. 2b. Luna thinks this is all about Enoch. 2c. Luna just posted how the Rockefellers have a secret plan to overthrow the government. 2d. Even ex-military involved like Gallaudet believes his house is haunted and that UFOs fly inside. WHY are all these people fringe/kooky? I will say, Burlison seems the most credible, but even he is now going around demanding “credit” for disclosure. TLDR: Does the characteristics of disclosure advocates makes you skeptical? Or is it totally unrelated? submitted by /u/Severe-Clerk-1477 [link] [comments]