The other day I was using Gemini to bounce a hypothetical lawsuit around and simulate how it would turn out most accurately. The suit revolves around the idea that the us navy filed patents showing zero point energy achieved as well as mass reduction. The struggle to get those patents, while they conclude not working with the budget they were given, a very important big wig signed off on a letter stating they were proven and needed to secure the patent before china as they were aware china was on the same hunt and coming up with results. So it was an arms race.(sources for this available online) That was a very strategic play for securing the rights to the tech in public commerce, then immediately moving it to private industry/military industrial complex under national security on a black budget. Proved it in public, got the security, shut it down moved it to black book, scaled it up. That’s the anatomy. One must be versed in Socratic teaching methods to understand the underlying plays to everything. Your typical chad would view this move as “they got close but it didn’t work, so they moved on”. If you take everything for face value, you will not see this coming. No one is moving on from 0 point energy or anti gravitics as that would be the magnum opus of human achievement. Sad part is it was achieved over 40 years ago. You all know that Wi-Fi thing right? Well there ya go. ENERGY AND DATA SENT THRU THE “AIR”. ITS NOT AIR AS YOU KNOW IT. It is not an absence of anything. it is a sea of particles and elements akin to a less dense ocean that many humans know how to harness. Even in the jungles of South America. Or the desert of Africa. “God separated the waters from above and below”. That serves as the backbone for the ensuing fraud. Essentially at that point, the USA proved there was better means of energy distribution and any industry also affected by this(all industry). “Material misrepresentation” on the universal scale. Much of why we are slow dripping disclosure is strictly paper and legal hurdles. When they proved there was a more advantageous way of energy distribution, they co signed every major corporation that deals in this field. Thus making all commercial contracts “void Ab initio”. They have hidden the fact the human race could have surpassed where we are currently and sold us lies and profit on false pretense that the product was the best they could offer. The central model that is proven here is a “false scarcity model”. Scarcity is the reason we pay for anything. Oil is scarce, homes are scarce, meaning there’s not an infinite amount of these. That was the set up to set back humans to a neo Stone Age. Energy, the one all around us that has been tapped time and time again, is not scarce. So here we have a false scarcity model running on fiat currency in which the Jeffery Epsteins know and have no problem admitting the money is not real. Bankruptcy for a mom and pop oblivious to the truth is heart wrenching, depressive. A bankruptcy to these fellas is a hat trick. No one’s sad, no one’s scared at that level. We’re not going to be naive and take what I’m saying as ALL things are infinite in their current state, as they have been manipulated to not be, but there’s a bonafide way to have anything we have now, in an infinite capacity. “Planned obsolescence” is another branch of this scarcity model. The reason iPhones 18,19,20,21 are all in the works/completed. But we only get iPhone 17. Phœbus light bulb cartel——shortened the lifespan of lightbulbs to make the consumer buy more. Biblically, a consumer is closer to evil(sheepism) than a producer(awareness). If your state of being is constantly consume whatever one can create, you will be swept into this model unknowingly. This scarcity is so ingrained in everyone, some folks will fight to preserve it, and or checkout/suicide when they realize they didn’t HAVE to live check to check. Back to the lawsuit, I asked how would one prove this and how would you get an iron clad ruling on this. Obviously the ai agent knew it would be the biggest case of all time, with universal implication. Essentially the smoking gun was the patents, the jury selection is where it couldn’t see a viable winning route to this case. As the jury would have to be immensely curated. Anyone believed to have any interest in this topic would be stuck out. You would have to get jurors who have no idea of this topic, and prove to them within the trial that what you’re saying is true. Here’s the kicker, at that moment, every juror who also lives under this scarcity model, would inherently benefit from the ruling. So they’re all struck out. So Gemini said something interesting, you would have to get “ELITES” who have nothing to gain from this info as they’re financial structures and family offices would permit them no immediate gain and even then they still would be tricky. So it’s almost as if someone’s thought this out and put certain law and blockades in place to not even bring this case even if one found it to be true. Next, there was a section about this only falling in certain jurisdictions. In some case the jurors would have to be local to that court/district. Now if we go to where the patents were filed, Patuxent River area Maryland—-most people here are military or military contractors so another conflict of interest in jury selection. I thought to myself there must be preliminary cases around the financial aspects of this topic- and there is. Danny Sheehan is laying a lot of precedent work for these financial suits to take place. In a short time, the legislation has been changing, the dialogue has been changing, to even bring a case like this in any seriousness. Actually thru this brush up with Gemini, its own verbiage was concrete and definite in discussing ZPE, NHI, UAP and USO. I asked specifically when did it start to discuss these topics as true and not fringe or conspiracy theories. It said within the last 6 months as the white house and everyone has let on. So the paradigm is shifting, perhaps this will be the biggest class action lawsuit of all time. I’m no expert in any scholastic capacity at all, of anything. I am an expert in self perception and self cognitive abilities. So I’m open to all interpretation and discussion as I’m not dying on this hill but I thought it had a cool view :3 submitted by /u/gangaffl [link] [comments]