I’m exploring whether UFO technology might not be grounded in the same fundamental framework as our incomplete standard model. Rather than being just a more advanced extension of our current science, could something like gravity-control technology arise from an entirely different underlying ontology? I’m curious what others think about that possibility. If there exists a more complete or alternative scientific framework (whether developed independently or classified within black projects), then it follows that some observed aerial phenomena may not be ‘advanced versions’ of current science and technology but rather manifestations of entirely different underlying principles. This wouldn’t be unprecedented in the history of science. Transitions like classical mechanics to quantum mechanics, or Newtonian gravity to relativity, didn’t just improve existing models; they revealed that the underlying framework itself was incomplete. Our current framework is similarly limited and incomplete, so it’s logical to conclude that UFO technologies are being engineered on a deeper model of reality. That could be why the phenomenon appears fundamentally noncompliant with our expectations. submitted by /u/MichaelB137 [link] [comments]