Doesn’t Bipartisan UAP Disclosure Result in a Quadlemma for Skeptics?
Doesn’t Bipartisan UAP Disclosure Result in a Quadlemma for Skeptics?
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio (R) and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D) have both talked about UAPs flying over US military bases and nuclear sites. They said we do not know what they are. These are very senior people in the government on intelligence committees with access to the most classified information. There are other senior legislators in both parties as well. So if you are a skeptic toward this type of thing, aren’t the only answers conspiracy theories themselves? The government developed advanced antigravity/whatever technology by itself and has hidden it from us for 80 years. Or an adversary nation btfoed the most expensive military’s tech. This would mean they are letting us suffer by not releasing it, as it could probably result in a greater good beyond military applications. CIA officials, senators, and senior naval pilots are lying about it all. Classic “government is complete liars for X/Y reason” conspiracy theory. They have had sensor/radar glitches for 80 years and are totally incompetent, and our pilots are burning taxpayer money flying after glitches and hallucinating on a military mission (eyewitness sightings). Self-explanatory/ hard to believe that f18 radars when we spend a trillion for the military are this crappy. NHI I would say 3 is the most plausible theory for skeptics, but it still completely erodes faith in higher institutions as it would prove them to be idiots in charge of nuclear codes. submitted by /u/jptboy [link] [comments]