I watched an interesting conversation with Thomas Persson, a former homicide investigator in Sweden who now focuses on the UFO/UAP topic. What I found interesting is that he doesn’t really approach it as “belief”, but more like an investigation. He talks about witnesses, corroboration, patterns, credibility, and what might hold up if some of these cases were treated more like court cases. He discusses the Nimitz incident, the Varginha case in Brazil, U.S. congressional hearings, military secrecy, psy-ops, AI, and why he thinks the core problem is not lack of evidence, but stigma and suppression. You obviously don’t have to agree with all of it. Some of his claims go pretty far. But I thought the framing was interesting, especially coming from someone with a background in criminal investigations rather than the usual UFO scene. Curious what people here think: is the UFO/UAP question still being dismissed too easily, or is the evidence still too weak? submitted by /u/Shot-Antelope4971 [link] [comments]