I put together a small Hugging Face Space for exploring public-source reports of mystery / unidentified / suspicious / unauthorized drone activity around sensitive locations. Link: https://huggingface.co/spaces/cjc0013/dronesightings It currently has 149 public-source report cases with source links, dates, country/region, site signals, evidence tiers, and plain-language caveats. Important boundary: this is not claiming these are anomalous, NHI, hostile, or even definitely drones in every case. It is a review index / triage map. The point is to make it easier to see patterns, find source links, and separate stronger cases from weaker leads. The dataset splits rows into rough evidence tiers: resolved sensitive-site reports named sensitive-site reports needing follow-up broader source-discovered reports The places include contexts like military sites, airports, maritime areas, emergency-service contexts, and critical infrastructure. I built it because a lot of drone/UAP discussion gets stuck in scattered articles, screenshots, and one-off reports. This is meant to be a cleaner starting point for people who want to inspect the sources directly. Would be interested in feedback from this sub, especially: obvious missing cases bad rows that should be removed better source links official statements / NOTAMs / police or military releases that can harden a case better ways to classify “strong” vs “weak” reports Again: not presenting this as proof of anything exotic. It is a public-source map for reviewing the reports more systematically. submitted by /u/Either_Pound1986 [link] [comments]