I’ve been diving deep into the recent UAP disclosures and whistleblower testimonies, and I’m struggling to bridge the gap between two very different "phenomena" being reported. On one hand, we have the Glowing Orbs (or "foo fighters" and balls of light). These are often described as behaving like pure energy or plasma—massless, capable of instant acceleration, and appearing almost sentient or "interdimensional" in nature. On the other hand, we have the Physical Craft that whistleblowers like David Grusch and others claim the government has retrieved through crash recovery programs. These are described as "nuts and bolts" hardware—solid objects with clear structures, interiors, and sometimes even "biological remains" or "pilots." I’m curious to hear your theories on the relationship between the two: • Are the orbs just a propulsion byproduct or a "field" surrounding a physical craft? • Are orbs autonomous drones/probes while the physical craft are the "mother ships" or crewed vessels? • Or are we looking at two completely different tiers of intelligence (e.g., one being extraterrestrial and the other being interdimensional/shadow-biome)? The "nuts and bolts" aspect feels very 20th-century tech, while the orbs feel like something out of high-level physics. If we have retrieved physical hulls, why are so many modern sightings just light? Would love to hear some informed takes or links to any specific data/cases that differentiate the two submitted by /u/RoadJunkie66 [link] [comments]