This substack article includes a critique of the MIC, particularly drawn from personal interaction, and how it relates and will relate to disclosure in a predictive way. It covers the nature of the ET threat (and only the threat) the MIC will likely present. This will suggest a synthetic and parasitic hivemind adversary that uses advanced technology and abduction to exploit a variety of sentient organisms and extend influence covertly, with historical and modern accounts released in upcoming UAP tranches which will build on that narrative. And finally, that the practical solution to these scenarios and presentations to come will not be more intelligence, more authority, or more middlemen, but a simple psychological approach. This is based on my experiences and interactions with defense companies like Raytheon and Boeing Phantom works, culturally-relevant bases like Wright-Patt, WSMR, Pine Gap, etc, plus war planners and members of special forces from several different countries, and various generals, admirals, politicians, and spies - some of which were involved in space affairs. Recently, I've added a former LANL scientist and a former nuclear submarine commander to the list. I honestly can't remember them all at this point. My goal isn't to use authority or credentials to support the argument here, cause I know there will never be enough for most people anyway, but to generate awareness in a space where attention is overengineered by bad actors. To summarize the article, the most fearful aspects of disclosure will be leveraged against your best interests. I know this is preaching to the choir here, but I encourage you to read the article to see the architecture of how we get there and why. It is only easy to dismiss now, but this effort will very rapidly escalate, and Jeremy Corbel's fake Phoenix Lights scenario is only one of several they could employ. Remember, the 2020 virus was invisible to the eye and initially downplayed, and yet became an extremely convincing vector for fear and control in the months that followed. Of course, that was a real virus pandemic and did cause measurable harm (as some aspects of the disclosure topic will mirror), but how people and nations reacted to it was controllable and today a subject of intense debate. We should have that debate beforehand this time. Be advised I'm speaking in a personal capacity and not on anyone/entities behalf. As always, speculation is like entertainment and should be consumed responsibly. https://substack.com/home/post/p-147940600 submitted by /u/EdwardBonaventure [link] [comments]