Possible explanations for the 1989 edit of the S4 map 8 days after Bob "Dennis" Lazar first gong public?

Possible explanations for the 1989 edit of the S4 map 8 days after Bob "Dennis" Lazar first gong public?
________________________________________ Prologue ________________________________________ This is a new wrinkle in the narrative so don't go reaching for your grifter guns just yet. At least not until you take the time to review this with due diligence. Personal opinions as to the nature of the character of anyone appearing in the linked video are irrelevant. Focus on the facts, not the faces. Your commentary will demonstrate if you actually took the time to review the new evidence before immediately jumping to the comment dialogue. This is also a preemptive invalidation of the cop-out comments in the vein of "I don't need to watch it because I already know he's a liar." Any offerings of this nature are hereby discredited. Your comments will not only show that you didn't take the time to review the new evidence, but also that you didn't even read the post. Here is a clean nip in the bud. Some of you will still act a fool (cause this is fucking Reddit for chrissakes) but it will be obvious, and you've already been called out. ________________________________________ Dialogue ________________________________________ It's been determined that the eastern road to S4 was removed from an official Department of the Interior map eight days after Bob's original whistle blow on the reverse engineering efforts happening there. Here's the timestamped link for your pasta recipe ---> https://youtu.be/d9tdJ2SkBKQ?t=1h29m00s The timing of the update to the map is sus AF, especially considering that the site is in the middle of nowhere and wouldn't be subject to factors requiring timely changes that could affect navigation like urbanization, development, etc... The map edit is also highly specific because of the single and seemingly arbitrary removal of the eastern road to leading to S4. Occam's Razor only lends credibility to Lazar's story. Unless, of course, there is a much more reasonable and logical explanation for the timing and the nature of edit in question, other than "aliens." Anybody got anything? Speculation? Experiential Department of the Interior cartographic modification regulatory policy knowledge? Jokes? (Funny ones only, please.) Please comment! ________________________________________ Epilogue ________________________________________ I originally posted this in r/UFOs as a kind of test to see if the mods there would let it fly. Bob's credibility in that sub is non-existent and laughably so. The mods took my post out with Rule 3 - "Be substantive." I'm still waiting for an explanation. I wasn't expecting anything less from their bought-and-sold admin. One might go so far as to view the r/UFOs mods' actions in this case as further circumstantial evidence still, tipping the scales in favor of the legitimacy of Lazar's allegedly tall tale. ________________________________________ Postlude ________________________________________ B keeps it real. We can actually talk like adults here. If you don't know this already, r/UFOB is unique among this kind of sub because of the code of conduct that exists in the community because of the moral code upheld by the moderation team. It's something that isn't really visible when you're just scrolling your feed. But if you take a closer look, it's there, and it's rare. Big ups to the people behind the curtain for letting happen what should and not what shouldn't. Saying "thanks" for the thankless work necessary to elevate the discourse from the eye of the tempest of enshittification. submitted by /u/Mi_Ki_Ii_Zaru [link] [comments]