Everyone is talking about the scientists. nobody is talking about the science. This piece is about what Amy Eskridge actually found, what Ning Li actually published, and why those specific discoveries, not the people, the work itself, represent an existential threat to the most valuable financial monopoly in human history. Gravity modification isn’t a fringe idea. it’s peer reviewed physics that appeared in physical review, received department of defense funding, and was considered serious enough by nasa to attempt replication. it’s also the one technology that would make fossil fuels structurally obsolete overnight. not gradually. overnight. The oil industry isn’t threatened by electric vehicles. EVs still need infrastructure, still need power generation, still leave the basic economics of movement intact. Gravity modification threatens the premise entirely. the monopoly isn’t on fuel. it’s on movement itself. and that monopoly generates two trillion dollars a year. The piece documents what happens when research gets that close to something real. Defunded programs. classified researchers. FOIA walls that don’t open, and Amy Eskridge, who understood exactly what she had found, who chose visibility over safety because she believed the public had a right to know, and who texted everyone she could find that she had not killed herself eighteen days before her death was ruled suicide. The question this piece asks isn’t who killed the scientists. it’s what they found, why it mattered, and who had two trillion reasons a year to make sure it stayed buried. Primary sources at the bottom. r/UFO decided anti-gravity technology was not “on topic” for some reason. From what I understand, it’s been central to the lore since at least Lazar.Either way, this post focuses more on the science than the sightings. submitted by /u/morecowbell1988 [link] [comments]