Neil deGrasse Tyson seems to be pivoting on UFOs. After years of mocking the subject, he’s now saying that military witnesses, whistleblowers, and congressional testimony have elevated the conversation. But as Bryce Zabel points out, Tyson still can’t resist stereotyping earlier witnesses as hayseeds and drunks — even though credible observers have been part of this story from the very beginning. In this sharp commentary, Bryce takes Tyson to task for treating ridicule like a scientific method. He explains why the issue was never just about “the back 40,” why earlier witnesses deserve more respect, and why Tyson’s current turn feels less like a revelation than a rebrand. Bryce also reflects on his past public challenge to Tyson, and on his very different parking lot debate years ago with Carl Sagan. This is not a call for belief. It’s a call for honesty, humility, and a little overdue accountability.