These Scientists Told Congress the Pentagon's UFO Chief Was WRONG

These Scientists Told Congress the Pentagon's UFO Chief Was WRONG
AARO's director told Congress no peer-reviewed UAP science existed. He was wrong — and these physicists wrote to Congress to prove it." Dr. Kevin Knuth and Dr. Matthew Szydagis — two University at Albany physicists who sent a formal correction letter to Senator Gillibrand — join The Good Trouble Show to reveal how AARO's director misled Congress about the state of UAP science. In this episode: → The letter that corrected AARO Director Kirkpatrick's testimony — on university letterhead, sent to the Senate → Breaking down their peer-reviewed research: the Nimitz flight characteristics analysis, the 139-author UAP science review, and the statistical model for accidental disclosure → UAPx: inside the university research program sending scientists into the field to study UAP → Why independent lab analysis of alleged UAP materials contradicts AARO's own Oak Ridge findings → Dr. Szydagis's published research on disclosure timelines — and what the math says about when secrecy fails → The 194-page, 139-contributor peer-reviewed paper that establishes UAP as legitimate science 🔬 ABOUT THE GUESTS Dr. Kevin Knuth — Professor of Physics, University at Albany (SUNY). Former NASA research scientist (Ames Research Center). Leads UAPx scientific field research program. Published 100+ peer-reviewed papers. Lead author of the landmark 139-contributor UAP review paper. Featured in Netflix's Encounters, National Geographic's UFOs: Investigating the Unknown, and A Tear in the Sky. Dr. Matthew Szydagis — Associate Professor of Physics, University at Albany. Experimental particle astrophysicist specializing in dark matter detection (LZ experiment). Co-developer of snowball chamber technology. Patents pending on small-scale nuclear reactor technology. Appears weekly on History Channel's The Proof Is Out There. 📖 PAPERS REFERENCED Knuth et al. (2019) — "Estimating Flight Characteristics of Anomalous Unidentified Aerial Vehicles" — Entropy, MDPI https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/21/10/939 Knuth et al. (2025) — "The New Science of Unidentified Aerospace-Undersea Phenomena (UAP)" — 194 pages, 139 contributors https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06794 Szydagis (2024) — "How much time do we have before catastrophic disclosure occurs?" — Limina: The Journal of UAP Studies https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12738 ⏱️ CHAPTERS 🔗 CONNECT Subscribe for investigative journalism on UAP disclosure, government accountability, and national security.