I thought it was a very good interview with a logical thought process and explanations. Key points he mentioned: Military personnel have to undergo a pysc evaluation after reporting UAP, which massively encourages them not to report what they see Admirals in the Navy have seen objects on sonar moving in impossible ways at impossible speeds In SCIFs, he's seen clear HD photos of UAP In those SCIFs, he says there were unelected bureaucrats who he thought were there to 'disrupt'. Despite being a Christian, he doesn't buy the 'demon' angle otherwise for example, why wouldn't they show up at Congress which can be an evil place. He doesn't believe it's Russian or Chinese - 'if the Russians had this, they wouldn't be bogged down in Ukraine, killing 000s of their own men' Any information requested through FOIA is useless as everything is done through contractors. He doesn't trust AARO - thinks they are trying to control the narrative and doesn't see a reason why any one department should control the information. He ends by saying that he doesn't think we'll ever get to the bottom of it, as it's gone on for too long and the military industrial complex is too involved. Thinks it will take the President or a scientist with proof to come forward on what they've worked on. submitted by /u/Sufficient-Fix-6213 [link] [comments]