I couldn’t help but notice the interference and low battery in the recent Ukrainian Telegram UAP video. I was reminded of similar interference in the 1996 Jonathan Reed video, where he had similar issues getting a clean capture of the craft and it seemed to get worse the closer he got to the craft with his camera. In order to obtain a glimpse of the craft Reed had to move relatively far away and zoom in. It was previously pointed out that the 1975 Lockheed Hopeless Diamond looks exactly like the craft in the Jonathan Reed video. I know Jonathan Reed is controversial. I personally have always found the video to be compelling. Many point to the bracelet / teleportation video with suspicion this was not legit. Thing is he said he was visited and had his house ransacked by MiB before the bracelet video was filmed. The original videos do not reference any kind of bracelet. The teleportation video had very little to do with the first. Put yourself in the shoes of an MiB agency. A real video is out there and it’s been saved on thousands, if not tens of thousands of machines and seen by hundreds of thousands if not millions of people. What’s the next step? Confiscate and discredit. It’s a super basic strategy, but effective. If you haven’t seen the “debunk” tv series? It’s insanely suspect: www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL56CC2960DEF58BE1 I included Dylan Borland’s testimony, only because he similarly notes the effect the craft he witnessed had on electronics; notably, his cell phone battery. This can’t be coincidental. Surely the battery and electronics interference is some byproduct of the craft? Potentially radiation from the propulsion mechanism? submitted by /u/20_thousand_leauges [link] [comments]