Not sure if anyone is watching this or if it is even new, but as it stands, it seems to be doing a rather okay job at being impartial. It has a very good section on the rebrand of UFOs, but, claims it was to get away from the stigma. Well, that's maybe one reason, but it would be foolhardy to think that the UAP flap had nothing whatsoever to do with the heightening tensions between nations. Sean Kirkpatrick is on it and is having a decent section on FLIR. Which spins back around to the whole gimbal video. Mick West is also on it so, it most definitely has a debunk hat on - which actually is a very good thing indeed. And if that offends you - you're quite possibly setting yourself up for long-term disappointment. Every subject, especially a subject full of pseudoscience and hoaxing, requires scrutiny when there are so many proven charlatans and media hacks in the game. That is even before we get to the sheer coincidence of the uptick in media and entertainment with AI and digital automation. It's a good watch. Edit: In fact, to my surprise, Alex Deitrich is actually one of the more grounded and eloquent of figures in the same status as Fravour, Graves, etc. Yet oddly she doesn't get so much attention as she appears to be more open minded to it being human-made tech. She did a section on Reddit and how some of her students have "gone down the rabbit hole" and rather distances herself from the tictac video and used very precise language. Aside of the untimely end, this is one of those docs that really needs more attention and due. It goes against the grain and it actually laid out some good counters to the belief that David Fravour managed to capture not one, but two UAP/UFO videos. The gimbal video and the Tictac. Considering the fact that there are hundreds of thousands of pilots in the skies on any given day, he has to be the luckiest guy alive. submitted by /u/No_Cucumber3978 [link] [comments]