Hi all, genuine question here. I’ve been reading and watching interviews related to AATIP and the broader UAP discussion, and I noticed that James Lacatski has shared some very strong claims in books and interviews. However, from what I understand, he has not testified under oath in a public or congressional setting. I’m trying to understand the reasoning behind this. Is it due to classification issues, legal restrictions, personal choice, or something else? I’m not looking to argue for or against his claims, just trying to understand why someone willing to speak publicly would avoid formal testimony under oath. Would appreciate any informed context or sources. Thanks! submitted by /u/proxyEntity [link] [comments]